A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Did all Roman cities need aqueducts?

Best Answers

Aqueducts were costly public works, and not all Roman cities necessarily required them. Some cities, such as Pompeii, had their water needs met by wells or public and private cisterns dug beneath houses. read more

Cities and municipalities throughout the Roman Empire emulated this model, and funded aqueducts as objects of public interest and civic pride, "an expensive yet necessary luxury to which all could, and did, aspire." Most Roman aqueducts proved reliable, and durable; some were maintained into the early modern era, and a few are still partly in use. read more

By the 3rd century AD, the city had eleven aqueducts, sustaining a population of over a million in a water-extravagant economy; most of the water supplied the city's many public baths. Cities and towns throughout the Roman Empire emulated this model, and funded aqueducts as objects of public interest and civic pride, "an expensive yet necessary luxury to which all could, and did, aspire". read more

The Roman aqueducts served many cities in the empire. The first aqueduct was the aqua Appia, built in 312 BC. For many scholars, the development of Roman engineered aqueducts was another piece of architecture that was new to the ancient world. read more

Encyclopedia Research

Wikipedia: