A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Should racists be protected under freedom of speech?

Best Answers

It's a gray area of constitutional law, but several experts said this week that the white supremacists may have crossed a line into what is known as unprotected speech. In 1942, the Supreme Court ruled that "fighting words" are not protected under the First Amendment. read more

The answer is no, unequivocally. For example there are non-discrimination laws that are not protected under freedom of speech. So barring “fighting words” and other case law exceptions, it is racist speech and not racism per se that are and should be protected under freedom of speech. read more

Racism should not be allowed and IS NOT allowed under the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech does not necessarily imply a complete liberty in voicing out your thoughts into words. Freedom of speech limits itself to profanities. Basically, if you verbally curse someone, then that is not included in the freedom of speech. read more

If all speech is protected by the First Amendment, then there is less room for government restrictions. read more

Encyclopedia Research

Wikipedia: