The question is meaningless on the face of it. You haven't defined any objectives which would motivate this conflict. The nature of the objectives which lead to conflict would define the shape of how it might play out, this is especially true in the case of positing Sun Tzu as one of the generals. read more
Aut Caesar, aut nihil! Sorry folks. Peter the Great stands no chance against Caesar. Caesar was was both a great strategist and a great tactician. He proved to be able to defeat a numerically superior foe, be it the Gauls or Roman legions. read more
Julius Caesar did not accomplish as much (militarily) but was still a brilliant tactician. Historians place the generalship of Caesar as one of the greatest military strategists and tacticians who ever lived, along with Alexander the Great, Sun Tzu, Hannibal, Genghis Khan, and Napoleon Bonaparte. read more
Although Julius Caesar did eventually abuse his power to a great extent, he was still a great ruler and did incredible things for the republic. read more