A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Why can't NASA be as cost effective as SpaceX?

Best Answers

Good question! The answer has to do with two things: history and incentives. First, history: NASA was founded in 1958, and for a long time it was the only big player in satellite construction and launches. read more

Boeing, Lockheed Martin, SpaceX and others have all bid on contracts. Keep in mind that NASA subsidizes SpaceX so the costs you see don’t really indicate the true cost. SpaceX also benefits from the experience of Boeing and Lockheed Martin in the space business. read more

As for designing from the ground up, the part about SpaceX using knowledge from NASA's space programs is definitely true - much of the basic science is there, and a lot of it is just a matter of putting it all together to make a cost-effective, reliable design - still a huge task, but one that can be pulled off in a matter of years, not decades. read more

As a SpaceX enthusiast, of course, I found the problem amusing. I mean, rockets involve at least 99 problems, but SpaceX does not have one with publicity. [Sorry, I had to.] However, I still questioned why SpaceX was having an awareness impact on space travel that NASA, in all its social media, outreach efforts, and resources couldn’t seem to mirror. read more

Encyclopedia Research

Wikipedia:

Related Facts

Related Question Categories

Image Answers

Why can't NASA be as cost effective as SpaceX? Why doesn't ...
Source: quora.com

Further Research