No, Tut was simply a transitional king serving between the reigns of his father, the notorious heretic king Akhenaten, Smenkhare (his immediate predecessor who died of plague), his successor, Ay (a holdover from the Akhenaten regime), and then Horemheb (who was like a father to Tut). read more
Historically speaking, King Tut did have some contributions, but not as much as other pharaohs. Asking the question, “does it matter” is actually a good thing, because it helps focus on the importance of archeology. read more