Types of Followership
A. Alienated Followers Alienated Followers are independent, critical thinkers who often describe themselves as people who think for themselves, are the true conscience of the organization and have a healthy skepticism.
Autocratic leadership is a style of management that involves quick, immediate decision making without consulting subordinates, even if the subordinates were capable of contributing to the decision making process.
This style of leadership is very similar to management rather than leadership as it focuses on the control and performance or work. The key difference is that bureaucratic leadership is also concerned with the people doing the work as well as the work itself.
Transformational leaders are charismatic, but they are also noted for leading high performing groups and teams, and developing followers’ leadership capacity, as much as helping the group or organization to change and innovate.
The link between leadership, management and enterprise performance is widely understood and accepted. Improving leadership improves management and raises the probabilities of better performance. That boards often change leaders when enterprises are slipping confirms the importance placed on ...
Developing dynamic followership is a discipline. It is jointly an art and a science requiring skill and conceptualization of roles in innovative ways—one perhaps more essential to mission success than leader development. Without followership, a leader at any level will fail to produce effective institutions.
Followership requires not merely obedience toward a follower, but an awareness of the group emotional welfare. I believe that there is such a thing as toxic followership, and toxic followership can be prevented through use of emotional intelligence.
Followership is the art and skill of effectively following a leader towards the achievement of a vision. Followership can exist in many contexts from sports teams to a formal work office to a church volunteer based project.
Followership may take the backseat to leadership but it matters: it matters a lot! Quite simply, where followership is a failure, not much gets done and/or what does get done is not what was supposed to get done.
Editorial Abstract: Rather than encouraging leaders to mentor followers to "follow me" as an imitation learning imperative, leaders may mentor to specific and objective abilities/traits to create dynamic subordinates. These dynamic follower competencies form a foundation from which follower initiative can grow to leader initiative more naturally.
Leaders have a responsibility to create an environment that permits these qualities but regardless, it is the responsibility of the follower to be a good worker. There is no such thing as a bad worker who is a good follower.
Laissez-faire leadership is a hands-off approach that allows followers to set rules and make decisions. Discover the pros and cons of this style. Laissez-faire leadership is a hands-off approach that allows followers to set rules and make decisions.
The flip side of leadership is followership. It stands to reason that if leadership is important to performance, followership must have something to do with it too. But curiously, followership gets only a small fraction of the airtime that leadership does.
Effective leaders can best serve their organizations by modeling the followership behavior they expect from others. If you are in a formal leadership position, your legacy as a leader can only be enhanced by your reputation as an exemplary follower.
culture in terms of servant leadership orientation, followership, and OCBs. Research related to employee retention and its relationship to servant leadership in ECCs is crucial for many reasons.
A Google search for the term “Followership” will provide a plethora of advice, examples and definitions. And it is clear that leaders are nothing without followers. Therefore the development of the skills in followership are essential if an organisation is to be successful.
Dynamic Followership. study guide for a test. STUDY. ... Sheep. passive/dependent uncritical thinking lack initiative
Survivors are chameleonic. They go with the flow, following the path of least resistance. They are most interested in playing it safe rather than taking a risk.
Introducing Followership into the Leadership Classroom: An Integrative Approach ... The transformational and charismatic leadership theories focus largely on the ...
Yes People are active, but they are dependent AND do not think critically. Because they are conformist, they will agree with the leader without question. Their major concern is avoiding Because they are conformist, they will agree with the leader without question.