A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Types of Evaluation

Assumption Monitoring
Assumption Monitoring

...measure conditions relevant to the performance of projects and programs, such as macro-economic, social, or political conditions, critical assumptions of a CDCS, and the assumptions column of project Logical Frameworks.

Completion — Summative, Outcome, and Impact Evaluation
Completion — Summative, Outcome, and Impact Evaluation

The program evaluation process goes through four phases — planning, implementation, completion, and dissemination and reporting — that complement the phases of program development and implementation. Each phase has unique issues, methods, and procedures. In this section, each of the four phases ...

source: atsdr.cdc.gov
Dissemination and Reporting
Dissemination and Reporting

Evaluation Reporting: ... EVALUATION REPORTING: A GUIDE TO HELP ENSURE USE OF EVALUATION FINDINGS | 1 . ... reporting and dissemination plan u

source: cdc.gov
Financial Monitoring
Financial Monitoring

The presentation is very interesting and full of information. But I can notify some disadvantages. I think it will be better if You give more information about the bodies which fight against money laundering in our country, which of them included to the law enforcement bloc and which to financial monitoring. And, please, give some examples of this bodies.

image: blogqpot.com
Formative
Formative

Summative assessment The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. Summative assessments are often high stakes, which means that they have a high point value.

source: cmu.edu
image: click4it.org
Impact
Impact

Impact evaluation assesses the changes that can be attributed to a particular intervention, such as a project, program or policy, both the intended ones, as well as ideally the unintended ones.

Impact Monitoring
Impact Monitoring

1.1. Main characteristics of monitoring, evaluation, and impact evaluation 2 1.2. How M&E can contribute to impact evaluation 6 2. How to build impact evaluation into M&E thinking and practices 7 2.1. Articulate the theory of change 7 2.2. Identify priorities for undertaking impact evaluation 10 2.3. Identify information/data needs 10 2.4.

Implementation — Formative and Process Evaluation
Implementation — Formative and Process Evaluation

types of evaluation you can conduct. What are the most common types of evaluation? There are several types of evaluations that can be conducted. Some of them include the following: • Formative evaluation ensures that a program or program activity is feasible, appropriate, and acceptable before it is fully implemented.

source: cdc.gov
Outcomes
Outcomes

Outcome evaluations assess the effectiveness of a program in producing change. Process evaluations help stakeholders see how a program outcome or impact was achieved. Impact or outcome evaluations are undertaken when it is important to know whether and how well the objectives of a project or program were met.

source: tsne.org
Planning
Planning

Evaluation is a systematic process to understand what a program does and how well the program does it. Evaluation results can be used to maintain or improve program quality and to ensure that future planning can be more evidence-based. Evaluation constitutes part of an ongoing cycle of program planning, implementation, and improvement (Patton, 1987).

source: cdc.gov
Process
Process

Taking process evaluation, a step further, it can also look at the processes of program, management and infrastructure together that is the capacity of an organization to deliver on its promised outcomes.

source: tsne.org
Process Monitoring/ Physical Progress Monitoring
Process Monitoring/ Physical Progress Monitoring

The RTI Implementer Series Module 2: Progress Monitoring focuses on the essential components of an RTI framework with a particular focus on progress monitoring. The module covers basic information on progress monitoring and a multi-step process for selecting progress monitoring tools.

References
References

Evaluation research became more sophisticated and began to go further than simple data gathering (Cronin 6). The subject of library evaluation also began to elicit increased interest and show increasing sophistication. In 1967 Crowley conducted one of the first unobtrusive testings of reference performance (Crowley; Weech and Goldher 306).

source: rpi.edu
Summative
Summative

Summative assessment The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. Summative assessments are often high stakes, which means that they have a high point value.

source: cmu.edu
image: nisenet.org
Technical Monitoring
Technical Monitoring

Monitoring and evaluation take place at different levels. The following box defines the common terms with examples. INPUTS The financial, human, and material resources used for the development intervention. Technical Expertise Equipment Funds ACTIVITIES Actions taken or work performed. Training workshops conducted OUTPUTS The products, capital goods, and services that result from a ...

Related Types